The Planning Commission, Where It All Begins

Planning Commission meetings continue to be source of news and surprises. The 9/8/05 one was no exception. Sal Panto formally withdrew the Strausser Enterprises’ proposal for the Village at Riverview Estates. He said that they will come back with a traditional housing development or "maybe even a new concept" sometime in the future. Both Joe Nixon (Morning Call) and Sarah Mausolf (Express Times) wrote all about it on 9/9/05. If you want to know more about the original project see Bos Meeting 3/17/2005, Rally In The Alley and BoS Meeting 6/2/2005.

Other projects were advanced at this PC meeting and some new projects were introduced. Please check out the NEWS page on the F.A.C. website for information about these and other projects in the Township. You’ll be amazed. Attend the meetings. They really are interesting. They are not all big, crowded special meetings like the one for Kings Mill, but they are where things get off the ground and they are very important. The PC meets on the 2nd Thursday of every month at 7:30 PM. They have workshop sessions on the 4th Tuesday at 7:00 PM.

By the way, we do not for one minute, think that Kings Mill is kaput. We don’t know when it will be on the Board of Supervisors’ agenda and likely will not know more than one day in advance (lest the room be jammed again). Try to plan your 1st and 3rd Thursday nights around the BoS schedule. Check the Township website on Thursdays to see the agenda online or call the Township office. The agenda deadline is Tuesday at 2:30 PM before the meetings however, the website often does NOT have the agenda posted until sometime on Thursday mornings.

BoS Meeting 6/2/2005

June 2nd's Board of Supervisor's meeting agenda was augmented by much discussion from the floor. Joe Nixon (Morning Call 06/04/2005) described the meeting's main issues thoroughly. Please read it. We will add some of the other details here.

REPORTS: SUPERVISORS, MANAGER, ENGINEER & SOLICITOR

• Supervisor Bonnie Nicholas reported that she, Chairman John Ackerman, and Township Manager Cathy Kichline have interviewed several candidates for the Director of Public Works position.
• Supervisor Donald Miller reported that he and Kichline met with a representative from Met-Ed to discuss trimming the Townships' trees (on the Giant side) near their power line. The result of the meeting is that Met-Ed will trim one tree for inspection by the Board. If the work is agreeable to the Board, Met-Ed will trim the rest of the involved trees.
• Ackerman announced that there is a public forum at the Crowne Plaza Hotel in Allentown on 6/8/05. He said that it was mostly for public officials to talk about building and things in general in the Lehigh Valley. He has a number to call for reservations if anyone is interested. (Read about this forum to explore unifying Lehigh Valley government in the Express Times 5/29/05 and the Morning Call 6/5/2005.)
• Kichline said that the schedule of road closings for Easton Suburban Water's (water main improvements) project will be on the Township website tomorrow (6/3/05). She also reported that she met with the flood victims (Route 611) and resolved some of their immediate concerns. She said that a representative from the Northampton County Congregation of Lutheran Churches (providing volunteer help) was there also. They will meet again in a few weeks when they expect to have answers to more of their questions, specifically about "releases." Kichline also noted that the house along Sullivan Trail that is to be razed will come down next week.
• Police Chief Dorney related that the Childsafe Program was a success and that 80 gunlocks were given out to Forks residents who attended. The department has more available for any resident who wants one. Dorney also reported that he, Kichline, Engineer Fred Hay, and Zoning Officer Tim Weis met with a PennDot representative to look into the lag time issue with the traffic light at Old Mill Road & Sullivan Trail (cited by EAHS student, Melissa Heisel BoS Meeting 4/21/05). He said they used a computer model to demonstrate the flow of traffic with and without the lag time. PennDot was previously provided with a copy of the Township's 2003 Traffic Study. The conclusion after looking at the computer model is that it's a balancing act between a safety issue and added congestion. A new traffic study is needed since the 2003 data is vastly different than what's on the roadways today. Hay's office will conduct a new study of that intersection. The new data will be re-modeled and the intersection will be re-evaluated. Dorney also said that he and Weis looked at Hill Road as well as the regulations from PennDot. He suggests the Hay get involved before any decision is made.
• Hay reported the Frost Hollow Swale contract is ready to be advertised. The bid opening will be 7/5/05 at 5:00 PM. Kichline noted that they (she and Hay) will meet with the affected property owners after the bid is awarded so that they are aware of what will be going on.
• Solicitor Kline reported that he received a call from representatives of Palmer Township requesting a meeting with Township officials to discuss the recreation path and the railroad bed. Staff and 2 Supervisors (Nicholas and another) will meet with them on 6/9/05 at 2:30 PM.

The DEBITS/TRANSFERS part of the meeting began with a discussion of whether or not the DEBT figure (now printed on every meeting's agenda) should include the interest owed as well as the principal. Supervisor Hoff suggested using the State "standard" which only includes actual debt. He said that if anyone wants to see what the interest figure is for each loan, that it is part of the annual review by the Township's auditors. Ackerman asked if could be listed separately (on the Agenda). Hoff posited that if the Township came into additional money and paid off its debt, it would owe only the principal and not 15 years of interest. Supervisor Holmgaard remarked that some of the interest rates are floating and the figure would have to be continually recalculated. Nicholas asked if the figure shown included the "sewer" and was told "no" by Hoff. Kichline added that she provided the Board with the debt statements from the 2003 audit (they have not yet received the 2004 audit) and the EAJSA installment payments are considered "operating costs" and not "debt" according to the State standards so they are not in the total.

COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR (NOT AGENDA ITEMS):

1. Sue Kocsis said that she was speaking for the majority of the people in the room and that they are opposed to changing the zoning map from Country Residential to Commercial for the Strausser Village Center and that this is not the location for commercial ventures. She suggested that it would be a great idea for Gary Strausser to donate his 25 acres to the Township for open space.
2. Scott Gingold spoke on the topic of the DEBT. He stated that he was the one at the last meeting who asked about the interest and was told that interest was factored in. He stated that at the end of the day the taxpayers will be paying the $13-1/2 million figure (includes the interest for the life of the loans). He questioned the decision to hire a financial manager (from the previous meeting) when the Township has this much debt. He asked how we could have this much debt with this much growth and this many new homes. He said that it is fiscally irresponsible to spend any more money until we take care of the debt, outside of essential services (police, fire department, etc.) that is. He advised the Board to think about that because we are "drowning in debt."

The STATUS UPDATE BY ALEX GALE/MUNICIPAL COMPLEX began with a review of the project financial report. Hoff asked, "Are we under budget and on target?" "Yes" was the answer. Nicholas questioned the figure for Schoor diPalma and was told that the old figure was for the base contract and that the new figure of $549K represents the addition of the "reimbursables" that was in a clause in the contract. Nicholas also questioned the 3 Corian window sills in the Police Department on the list at $1100. Gale said he questioned that item too but the price is the correct one for sills that measure approximately 24" X 38". In his list of work-in-progress Gale noted that the metal roof is destroying radio communication within the Police Department building. The Fire Department will have the same problem. The hoped for solution will be to add antennas and/or speakers in the hallways. Nicholas questioned whether the architects knew about this (when designing the buildings). Gale stated that it never came up in any of the architects meetings. Gale also reported that the roofing contractor does not fully man the job. He is on his third notice and may get replaced next week. Nicholas asked if the Municipal Building was still on schedule for the last week of September (move in date.)

Ackerman began the discussion of FEES: DEVELOPERS' FEES/TEMPORARY SALES by stating that they had not been raised in quite some time. He recommended that residential Recreation Fees go to $1800 and that the residential Offsite Capital Improvement Fees be raised to $2050. Nicholas asked Kline if this was in accordance with Article 5-A. Kline said "no." He explained that these are fees that represent to the developers "the cost of doing business" and that the developers have been paying for quite some time. Nicholas said that she was under the assumption that the Township could get more under Article 5-A. Kline said that the State changed the rules at the last minute and made it unworkable but that the Township enacted the Impact Fee Ordinance. He said that the Township collected a considerable amount of money under that Ordinance but ultimately repealed it and gave the money back. The Township enacted its own Capital Improvement Fee.

Jim Wideman (PC) asked how the Township established the small ($300) fee increases. He noted that the Township has a golden opportunity to bring the debt down and to improve the infrastructure with new projects. Resident Gingold said that our schools are overcrowded and that the last thing we need is one more house in our town. He remarked that for the "big boy developers" this is "tip money." Gingold noted that states all around us are doing everything they can to buy back open space and that we are running out of it. Ackerman said that the fees get paid by the homeowners. Gingold said to make the price of admission more in line with places like Chevy Chase, MD or Greenwich, CT where one decides if one can afford to live there. He said that the future homeowners do not live here yet. Wideman noted that the LV Planning website shows the population projections for the next 20 years and that our population is projected to increase to close to 20,000. He said that this is our opportunity to retire our debt and fix our infrastructure. Hoff said that they've done a lot with the money collected.

David Howell (ZHB) suggested that everyone look in the Morning Call archives (1997) and read why the Township repealed the Impact Fee (to encourage development.) Howell said that the articles gave $1600 as an example of fees charged in 1997, and that the proposed fee increases are hardly an increase at all. Howell also asked how the Township accounts for fees and for the capital improvements. Hoff stated that it's been used to purchase land (probably 150 acres) and took it (the land) out of development, thus indirectly providing capital improvements. He stated that five years ago, they set aside 30% of the fee to go for fire protection. He further stated that much of the money is being used to help put in the new Municipal Complex. Howell asked if citizens can see an accounting of the fees and their use on the Township website. Kichline said that the funds are listed on the financial statements and that citizens can come to the Municipal Building front desk and ask for the report since it's a public record.

Nicholas said that she would like to look into the fees a bit more. She asked if the fees had to be held for a certain amount of time or if they can be raised whenever the Township wants to raise them. Kline said that they can be raised whenever they want to do that. Nicholas remarked that NOW she is seriously thinking that the Township needs a Financial Manager. There was more discussion with audience members asking why not making the fees dramatically higher. Kline explained that the courts won't let Townships raise the fees to prohibit building. It was suggested that the fees be raised to $2500 each. Another resident suggested that surrounding Townships fees be compared to ours and was told that they had done that and that ours were possibly higher. The increases were approved with a 5:0 vote. They will be in effect in five days.

Fees for temporary sales (tents for example) were discussed next. Kline said that the Zoning Ordinance will need a provision for transient retail business and fees. The fees would then be established by Resolution. That takes time. He said that Chapter 133 in the Township Code deals with peddling and soliciting and fees that can be established by Resolution. Kline suggested in view of speed, to make an addendum to the Township Code that makes the definition really clear. Weis said that other Townships charge as much as a $100 a day and that the vendors pay it. Sal Panto suggested that the Township put in a section that limits non-profits to using their own locale. He pointed out that it will prevent vendors from getting a local non-profit to front for them. The Board voted to have Kline prepare the document and the Resolution to raise the fees to $100/day.

The CURRENT BUDGET REVIEW was postponed until the next meeting. Kichline explained that she will be meeting with Hoff next week and that she will have it for the next meeting. She also suggested that she present it to the Board for the first meeting of the month but not put it on the agenda until the second meeting. This will give the Board two weeks to look over it.

Sal Panto gave a short summary of the STRAUSSER VILLAGE CENTER CONCEPT by stating that there were many endorsements for the plan. Holmgaard stated that he has a serious problem with the road (Winchester Drive) going through the middle of the project. Panto wondered if they could move the Village Green to behind the storefronts. Miller said that the PC was divided 50:50 and the Township's planner was in favor of it and that school taxes are killing the residents of Forks. Ackerman noted that the concept has more density than if it's not implemented. Ackerman asked if Winchester Drive could be moved. Panto replied that it's already being paved and has a 12" water main under the road. Ackerman stated his concern for the stores not making it and becoming empty space. Panto asserted that all of Straussers' commercial spaces have 100% occupancy. Nicholas stated that she had a figure from a long time ago that said that for every $1 a house brings in, the Township puts out $1.37. She said that this project would be great in the Town Center. She also noted that there are no driveways (permitted) on Winchester Drive and with this project, people would be walking across it. Panto replied that there is a bikepath that crosses Winchester. Hoff said that he has no problem with the concept but is concerned with problems faced in the past with Strausser.

Audience comments: Gretchen Gerstel noted that the people who paid money for the new houses were not told of the commercial development plans. Panto said that it's been on their website since day one. A new resident said that she wasn't informed. Panto said that she must have bought her home from Segal & Morel. Michael Kuenne said that the plan was on the board when he bought his home on Hollow View Drive. He said that he could have had 100 people there but that the agenda wasn't published soon enough. He stated that he is disturbed by the "open hostility" of many of the older residents towards the people who have moved in. He said that the new residents want to work with the older residents. Jim Wideman noted that according to Section 303 of the Municipal Planning Code zoning ordinance changes must go to the Planning Commission. Holmgaard said that it is before the Board because the Planning Commission's vote was a tie. Panto explained that they were just asking whether the project should go to the next step which will be to make a formal request before the Planning Commission for a zoning change. Nicholas stated, "If we make a zoning change here, we are opening the floodgates for everybody else."

Kline then gave background stating that a proposed draft was submitted on March 4, 2005. He further explained that this project is within the discretion of the Board. It went to the PC first and their tie vote forced it on to the Board as no formal action was taken one way or the other by the PC. If the Board decides to review this further, the developer will need to submit revised sketch plans. He suggests that the Board then give it to their planner to come up with appropriate development on that site. He said that there will have to an amendment to the zoning ordinance to allow this. Next would be another public hearing and then the Ordinance would go to the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission to be voted on. Lastly, the developer has to submit a plan that complies with the amended ordinance.

The Board was polled with Holmgaard, Hoff, & Miller voting YES. Ackerman and Nicholas voted NO. Panto offered to work with the Township's planner. Kline said that "once you've got the ordinance, then any developer in any area that this applies to, will try to max it out." He cautioned that the Board "make sure that the Ordinance doesn't have provisions that will allow them to max it out in a way that is contrary to the Township's wishes."

Terry McClain (sic) stated that she wants the Board to be aware if this project goes to planning that she has been to 3 meetings to discuss a drainage issue with Riverview behind her property. She is concerned that there will be future damage to her property from the way things are being developed. Ackerman said that he, Weis and Hay are going to come out there. In fact, Hay said he was there twice. McClain said that he didn't knock on the door to let her know he was there. She said that she talks to her new neighbors and that some of them offered to come to the meeting with her.

Holmgaard said that the LANDSCAPING FOR THE FORKS MUNICIPAL COMPLEX includes the idea to sell memorial markers/plaques that include the common name and the Latin name of the trees. There are 100 major trees planned. Nicholas asked the price range. Gale said they are looking for a contribution of around $300. Gale noted too that if the tree list is acceptable, he must begin reserving them for Fall planting. This was approved in a 5:0 vote.

BEN JON ROAD PAVING is being 1/2 (one side) done by Omega Development. Hay suggests that the Township contract with the same company to do the Township's side of the road at the same time. This is permitted (no bids) if the developer contracts to pay the whole thing and the Township reimburses him for its half. Ben Jon Road will go through to the other side and Knollwood has paid fees to NOT build the road. Nicholas questioned the additions on the bottom of the page and Hay explained that they are typical contract details, "normal boilerplate." Scott Gingold suggested that the Township ASK the developer to donate the paving. Weis said that they did the repair work for the Township once just by asking. Kichline said that she will ask. The motion was carried 5:0 (just in case the developer won't donate it.)

FINALIZE CCTV SYSTEM IN THE FIRE AND MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS - Holmgaard said that it will take an extra $40K to finish the project and that it's possible that there are grants available from the Department of Homeland Security. Nicholas asked if the insurance will go down with all the extra security. Kichline said she would check. Gale said that the existing contractor should be used to finish the job. The vote was 5:0 to finish the project.

AUTHORIZATION TO HIRE FULL TIME POLICE OFFICER - Chief Dorney explained that there was a vacancy created when Officer Terre Feinberg resigned. He said he contacted former part-time officers and selected Officer Trevor Baruda (sic) for submission to the Board. He brings to the department full blown certification with truck inspections and truck weights and measures. The vote to hire was 5:0. He starts Monday.

AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE 2005 DODGE DAKOTA FOR PARKS - The low bid was $18964. The Board voted 5:0 to purchase the new truck. Ed's old truck will go to the Recreation Department. Recreation is paying for 1/2 of the cost.

AUTHORIZATION TO HIRE FULL TIME PARKS LABORER - Kichline stated that the Parks budget included this full time position. Nick Horton, currently part-time, has finished school and will be full time on Monday. The vote to hire was 5:0.

An EXECUTIVE SESSION was called by Kline who wished to discuss potential litigation. No action was taken and the meeting was adjourned.

Our objective is to relate what is experienced at Forks Township meetings for those who cannot attend. We are attempting to be as factual as we can. If we make a mistake, tell us via email or Comment here in the blog, and we will do our best to correct it. We are not perfect. We want to get it right.

"Rally in the Alley" ...Sal Panto

The Strausser Enterprises presentation before the Joint Meeting of the PC & BoS on Tuesday, May 24th was attended by a SRO (standing room only) audience of concerned residents. Joe Nixon (Morning Call 5/25/05) wrote an excellent piece describing the mixed reactions of all present as well as the scope of the proposed project.

Sal Panto, the Strausser representative who did the "show and tell" for the proposed Village Center Zoning Ordinance, explained that they (Strausser Enterprises) met with the Township staff (Kline, Kichline, Hay, and Weis) to come up with project changes that might be more amenable to the Township. He described the golf course history and said that there's a bear that makes monthly visits and that they are trying to make it "even more of a natural habitat than when the farmers were growing corn..." He asserted that the Village at Riverview was planned 6-1/2 years ago and because they didn't own the land then, it wasn't included in the original PRD (Planned Residential Development). He said that if they had owned the land then, it would have been approved by the Board at that time. He touted the benefits of adding a commercial center in the middle of the Riverview residential area.

PC Chairman, Vito Tamborrino, asked Panto to explain the proposed zoning ordinance. Panto replied that it was taken from ordinances in other communities and that it follows the "State ordinances." Panto said that they did not ask for an "overlay" because in the future others would come in and want to use it (the overlay) in areas where it wouldn't be compatible. Panto confirmed that they wanted not to change the Zoning Ordinance but to change the zoning map. The project would involve 68,000-70,000 square feet of commercial space and 215 dwelling units. Supervisor Bonnie Nicholas commented that that would mean 500 extra cars and asked about the "open space." Panto said there would be a lot (of open space) if the parking is included. He speculated that "open space" would probably be around 25% with the PRIVATE 4-1/2 acres of Recreation Center. Planning Commissioner Jim Wideman pointed out that the Recreation Center is a subdivision and that the entire project density is a quite a bit more than the CR district would allow. CR would allow only 80 houses. Panto offered to leave some of the parking as green space until it's needed as parking and then it will be paved. Planning Commissioner Dean Turner noted that we have a struggling Town Center district and that this might compete with it. Turner said that this project would be good in the Town Center district but not out in the countryside. Planning Commissioner Erik Chuss stated that the density is unbelievable and that it appeared to be trying to turn a suburban area INTO an urban area. Both Nicholas (BoS) and Les Ottenwalder (PC) noted that they would support the plan if it was all on one side of Winchester Drive. Various audience members presented comments both for and against.

A vote, taken to recommend or not recommend to the Board that this project go forward, ended in a 3:3 tie. No recommendation will be made to the Board by the Planning Commission.

BoS Meeting 4/7/05

This very long meeting of the Forks Board of Supervisors ended after 10:30 PM. It really began at 6:30 PM with a presentation by Urban Research and Development Corporation (yes, the same organization helping the Township to revise its Zoning Ordinance) of the Two Rivers Area Greenways Plan. The Action Plan is a good read for all of us and will be especially interesting to the Forks residents currently fighting Palmer Township's land condemnation. Forks was fortunate to be the first of the involved municipalities to hear the presentation. It is well described in Chris Pollock's Express Times (4/8/05) article. Joe Nixon's Morning Call (4/8/05) article focused on the progress made with the new Municipal Complex.

REPORTS: SUPERVISORS, MANAGER, ENGINEER & SOLICITOR

• Supervisor Nicholas reported that she and Chairman Ackerman are interviewing people for the Director of Public Works position.
• Nicholas also reported that she "walked in on" a meeting with Township staff and Zawarski & Benner about the proposed zoning overlay (on 400 acres of FP zoned land).
• Supervisor Holmgaard announced that the new Township website is up and that the ENTIRE Township code will be available there as will all forms that residents may need. He went on to say that it will be an "efficient tool for fast communications... instant communication, that is what it really is for."
• Supervisor Miller reported that the winter sports season is over and that they have shifted to outside activities.
• Dennis Knesz of the DPW has worked for the Township long enough to move to the next pay level and Ackerman asked the Board to put him at the new pay level retroactive to his employment anniversary date in March. The Board agreed.
• Township Manager Kichline expressed thanks to the Emergency Services crew for their remarkable efforts during the flood emergency. She reported that the blood drive last Halloween earned a plaque for the 20 employees who gave blood and that it may become an annual Halloween event. Also, she said that the Bushkill Stream Conservancy wants Township support for the Two Rivers Area Greenways Plan and it will be an agenda item at an upcoming meeting.
• Police Chief Dorney reported that the Seat Belt Enforcement Education Program awarded the Township $3K and that the fundraiser sponsored by the Criminal Justice Program (as well as private contributions) earned enough money to purchase a bullet proof vest for Milan, our new dog.
• Tim Weis (Emergency Management Coordinator) reported on the storm work stating that 23 homes sustained major damage and 28 received minor damage. He told of the road closings and the evacuations.
• Peter Gheller (DPW Director) reported that the Township helped PennDot with the cleanup on Route 611 and that the road was reopened to traffic in the afternoon (4/7/05.)
• Fred Hay, Township Engineer, reported on the Sycamore and Frost Hollow swales and stated that he was working with a homeowner to save a tree.
• Solicitor Kline stated that the Frost Hollow swale is designed and that they are ready to get bids. The holdup has been obtaining easements from two homeowners. One is now okay with the project but the one at 2302 Lone Cedar Drive refuses to sign. The only option is to condemn (700 sq. ft.) if Hay can't fix it. The property owner wants a guarantee that his tree will live.
• Kline also reported that Township staff met with Sal Panto and Phil Seibert (sic) and that there was a good give and take regarding road layout and density (for the requested zoning change on 25 acres amid the Riverview Estates development). Strausser will revise the plan and will request a joint meeting with the Board and the Planning Commission before the plan is submitted. (A resident asked that Kline stop using the term "cookie cutter" when referring to anything but the desired Village. Kline said he was only reporting the meeting.)

CORRESPONDENCE:

1. Nicholas said that she will be attending PSATS on Monday.
2. Kichline noted that because of a relocation by his employer, Brent Alinger is resigning from the Planning Commission effective May 1, 2005. Ackerman asked Kline how long the BoS has to fill the position (term ending 12/31/06) and was told 30 days from the effective date. Advertisement of the position in the newspaper and on the Township website was authorized by the Board. The Planning Commission will narrow down the field of candidates and then the Board of Supervisors will make their choice.

COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR (NOT AGENDA ITEMS):

1. Sue Wexler (sic) of Heather Lane asked the Board what the Township's plans are to fix the storm water runoff problem on Heather Lane. She said that it was running like a raging river again from the weekend's rains. Hay said that the grate over the access pipe was clogged again (Giant pond) and that the Township cleared it. The Township has been trying to locate the new owners of the property. They are somewhere in Wisconsin. The Township plans to put in bigger storm pipes and are hoping to have it done by the end of the summer. Ms. Wexler said that her quality of life is being diminished and that she holds the Board of Supervisors accountable.
2. Fritz Weide stated that the debt figure was not on the agenda and wanted to know why. Kichline stated that it was on a month ago and only changes every 6 months. She will put it on for every meeting. Weide also said that he agreed with the resident who spoke up earlier, that "Sal Panto wants to ramrod another development."
3. Virginia Jackson thanked the cleanup crew for getting the construction debris off of her field. She warned that the 25 acre development north of her farm looks to be a water problem draining on to her fields and home. Hay told her that water flow is being considered in the developer's new plan. Jackson said that she wants it in writing from the Township or the developer that they will absorb the costs of any damages that occur. She said that "they build, cause damage, and leave causing much heartache." Ackerman stated that the storm water issue is addressed in writing on the plan. Jackson also said that there is a sinkhole in that field. And, she stated that she cannot even go outside her house to work in her garden without a "developer pouncing on" her.

The STATUS UPDATE BY ALEX GALE/MUNICIPAL COMPLEX was as expected, detailed and informative. The site contractor returned this week on the PD site and he foresees no problems to its completion by 4/30/05. He submitted a $2K change-order for a utility locator service because many of the lines are not recorded and are a maze. He said that Ed and his crew completed the wiring in the new park building. Ackerman interjected that all residents should visit it. Gale said that it should be "the standard for future" Township buildings. Ackerman asked for a workshop session at 6:30 PM before the next BoS meeting (4/21/05) for a tree walk and to discuss the relocation of offices.

A Design Waiver was granted in 5:0 vote for HORNSTEIN ENTERPRISES, INC./PENN'S RIDGE PHASES 9 & 11 for the location of street trees. The same number of street trees will be planted but because of driveway cuts the spacing will be different than the Township requires.

Kline reported that all was in order for RIVERVIEW ESTATES WEST, PHASE 1/DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENTS. It was approved 5:0.

The FORKS SELF STORAGE LAND DEVELOPMENT/IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS were approved 5:0. This property is on the NW corner of Sullivan Trail and Uhler Road (behind the bank.) Kline reported that all is in order. The developer paid $5K in lieu of a traffic study. There will be no hazardous material storage allowed at this facility.

KNOLLWOOD ESTATES PHASE 1/DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENTS were approved 5:0. This property is south of the swale along Zucksville Road. Kline stated that these indemnification agreements allow the developer to get along with site improvements.

OLDCASTLE BLOCK/DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENTS were approved 5:0. Kline stated that all was in order and that the developer has promised to take care of some of the storm water problems there.

The ZONING AND SALDO ENFORCEMENT ACTION/S&R BALAZS was more complicated. Kline explained that the property owners on Zucksville Road were informed when they bought their lot (part of a two lot subdivision) that it called for sidewalk and curbing and a bond to relocate the utility pole. The Balazs never posted the bond. They moved in without a CO but did install the required sidewalk and curbing. They did not have the utility pole moved. The estimated cost to move the pole is $15K. They built a well and got a waiver to not move the water line. A resident said that there are 3 other properties without sidewalks and that the road is unfinished. Kline said that this is a case of willful violation and requested the Board to authorize his staff to pursue an action against the Balazs. It was approved 5:0.

RESOLUTION - DEDICATION OF STREETS/GREENLEAF ESTATES SUBDIVISION - Kline stated that the paperwork is in order to qualify for the Liquid Fuels Credit. It passed 5:0.

RESOLUTION - AUTHORIZING BERKHEIMER ASSOCIATES TO COLLECT AND RETAIN FEES FOR COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT E.I.T. - There was no discussion and it passed 5:0.

The DISPOSITION OF LAMBERT HOUSE AND HOUSE NEAR WRESTLING BUILDING discussion focused mainly on the Lambert house as the other has been used by the fire department for training and is beyond salvaging and will be demolished. The mansard roofed Lambert House on the corner of Newlins and Richmond will be razed and the outbuildings used by the FD for training and then demolished. The Forks Township Historical Society cannot afford to restore it. The house cannot be burned (per DEP). This was approved 5:0.

The POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS discussion involved concern over the infrastructure now that phone lines are used. Holmgaard suggested installing a "shadow server" as backup to the main server. He will report back with the cost at the next meeting. It was approved 5:0.

The RELOCATION OF OFFICES IN THE NEW ADMINISTRATION BUILDING was held over to the workshop at the next meeting.

APPROVE FURNITURE PURCHASE/NEW ADMINISTRATION BUILDING - This was a long discussion. Nicholas said that the original presentation (4/4/05) was done by the architect and that all three vendors wanted to do their own presentations so that they can answer questions. She also noted that the price disparity was great and that the itemized prices were removed from the packets that the Board received. She learned that delivery was 6-8 weeks and not what the Board had been told as 12-14 weeks. The presentation will be rescheduled for April 12th or 13th and will take up to 3 hours. Alex Gale (member of the design team) stated that Nicholas has "driven a wedge" between the design team and the vendors. Nicholas also stated that there is a privacy concern (residents' confidential records) in the design. Holmgaard said that "we need privacy." Ultimately, about the entire furniture discussion, Holmgaard said, "Tell me what you want to do." Nicholas replied, "Eliminate one vendor and get the other two to do presentations comparing apples to apples."

The Board went into executive session to consider a personnel issue. They took no action and the meeting was adjourned.

Our objective is to relate what is experienced at Forks Township meetings for those who cannot attend. We are attempting to be as factual as we can. If we make a mistake, tell us via email or Comment here in the blog, and we will do our best to correct it. We are not perfect. We want to get it right.

BoS Meeting 3/17/2005

This well attended Board of Supervisors meeting was a long one. It began early (at 7:00 PM) with a Conditional Use Hearing (really a presentation) of Strausser Enterprises proposed (Riverview Estates private) Recreation Center and ended with an executive session to discuss a personnel issue. In between there were other important agenda items, including the problem facing Forks residents living near an abandoned rail line that Palmer Township wants for its rails-to-trails program. Joe Nixon's (MCall 3/18/05) report focused on the Strausser project and Chris Pollock's (Express Times 3/18/05) on the Palmer vs. Forks residents' bikepath mess. Both articles give excellent accounts and should be read. (We apologize for the filesize of the Express Times article.) We will try once again to fill in the blanks.

CONDITIONAL USE HEARING - STRAUSSER ENT/RECREATIONAL CENTER FOR RIVERVIEW ESTATES:

Solicitor Kline explained that Strausser Enterprises is proposing to construct a recreation center in the CR district. Its size has changed from 4.5 acres to 3.9.

Sal Panto, Strausser's representative stated that they were presenting "new urbanism" and advised the Board that if they didn't want it then it could be developed as a "cookie cutter" subdivision. (An idea of the layout can be found in this sketch done from memory by a meeting attendee.) Some of the points covered during Panto's part of the presentation included:

• Strausser Enterprises wants to redefine SUBURBIA
• There will be no "at night" golf on the practice range
• Over the winter, they constructed bluebird cages and bluebird houses on the golf course
• They have "encouraged the deer to stay"
• The Falk (sic) house has been restored
• They have employed "adaptive re-use" by using the stones from the 25th St. abutment as a retaining wall
• Strausser has paid $11 million in capital fees to the Township
• There will be an 8000 sf (square feet) limit on commercial space with 2000 sf on average
• The buildings will be 2-3 stories (although they prefer 4)
• The Lehigh Valley Planning Commission was positive about this project
• All the requirements for the CR district are met except for commercial

Strausser's professional land planner, Phil (sorry, we did not get the last name), added the following:

• There will be 2000 to 3000 homes within a 10 minute (1/2 mile radius) walk
• Forks' current Town Center is not suitable for pedestrian use
• There will be 22000 sf of offices with live/work condos above them
• There will be 59000 sf for commercial use
• There will be 29 townhomes and 17 village homes
• The townhomes will have 24' x 40' yards
• The senior living facility will be 3 stories high
• The office spaces will have loft/condos over them
• The village green will be 150' x 300'
• There will be a "transparent fence" (wrought iron) along Winchester Drive
• There will be wide sidewalks around the village green
• There will be 120 Senior "units" (apartments)

Mr. Panto went on to explain that the old Board and the old Township Manager (Gemmel) wanted this. And, that Strausser Enterprises wants the pool open by May 2006.

The regular meeting.................
REPORTS: SUPERVISORS, MANAGER, ENGINEER & SOLICITOR

• Supervisor Nicholas stated that the Sterling Hills detention ponds will NOT be dedicated to the Township (a correction to the previous meeting's minutes).
• Supervisor Hoff reported that there was an Emergency Services meeting last Monday.
• Nicholas reported that the new Dell 6000 PC for the Sewer Department will cost $1100.
• Supervisor Miller reported that basketball is winding down and that baseball has already started and that "spring is around the corner."
• Chairman Ackerman reported that he met with Pete Gheller and Chief Dorney about changing the location of the police firing range to a safer one (up one level).
• Township Manager Kichline reported that the Township got a performance grant for 2003 and that the monies will go the Sanitary Fund. She thanked Sharon Fisher for "keeping track."
• Engineer Hay reported that the Newlins Road bridge is now open and that the Frost Hollow pumping station is moving along.

COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR (NOT AGENDA ITEMS)

1. Resident Terry McClane (sic) stated (in reference to the Strausser presentation) that she was glad to see what was happening and that she is disturbed by the plan since she already has a water problem created by the (Segal & Morel - Riverview Estates West) construction around her home. She said that the backfill is 5 feet higher than her level. Nicholas suggested that Fred Hay check the plans.
2. Fritz Weide addressed the Board commending it for holding the tax rate at 4.6 mil for the last 3 years. He said that there should be something in the Township bylaws dealing with nepotism. And, he told the Board that they should not meet with developers individually. He said that this is "bad government. Good government is open government." He thinks this should be in writing.
3. Vito Tamborino (resident and Chairman of the Planning Commission) said that northbound drivers on Sullivan Trail are making left turns into Dunkin Donuts and that it is very dangerous. The sign says ENTER on both sides. He suggested having the sign removed and adding a NO LEFT TURN sign. Chief Dorney and Tim Weis will contact PennDot.

We learned in the STATUS UPDATE BY ALEX GALE/MUNICIPAL COMPLEX that the site contractor will be back on the site in the next 1-1/2 weeks and that the paving should be done by the end of April. After that they will work on the Giant pond. He hopes that the Police Department building can be occupied by May 1st. The contractor will be checking the Municipal Building footers for heaving (from the winter) and will replace any that need it. Met-Ed received the right-of-way agreement from Giant. He commended Ed for doing a nice job on the electrical work in the new park building. As to the plaque, Ackerman stated that the Board would hold off on a decision until next meeting.

AWARD BIDS: (A) CCTV - to I.C.U. for $12,100 - for the PD building - Approved 5:0. Holmgaard stated that there is no Federal requirement that the rest of the complex have a CCTV system and he thinks that one should be installed while the walls are open. The BoS will take it up later. (B) FUELING TANKS - three bidders backed out and one was too high. It will be put out for bids again. Nicholas suggested that in the future all bids be opened in public perhaps at a workshop before a regular meeting. Hoff noted that this takes time. The opening of bids in public was approved 5:0.

The CONDITIONAL USE/RIVERVIEW RECREATIONAL CENTER discussion began with Ackerman asking if the land was subdivided. Panto replied that it was not and that Strausser Enterprises wants the opinion of the BoS on the Village Center. He doesn't care (he said.) He stated that 3.6 acres is for the recreation village and that it will go on the bike path. "That's what the bike path system is for."

Vito Tamborino (PC and in the audience) stated that the letter from the Planning Commission is not complete. It should be added that the PC is in favor of going to the next step. He noted that there was no NOTICE to the public for the "whole" thing only for the Conditional Use. He also pointed out that 250 units of housing is like 50 extra if there was no Village. Tamborino recommended a JOINT MEETING of the PC & BoS.

Hoff stated that it was an excellent presentation but did NOT address the Conditional Use and he can't approve it. Nicholas said to "get rid of the housing." She would like the commercial to be like Peddlers' Village. Holmgaard commented that it was better than "cookie cutter" and that they can deal with the density. Miller stated that he agrees with Vito and that it should be denied and sent back to the PC. Panto said he would be happy to sit down with Urban Research & Development. (Aside: UR&D is working on the Township's zoning revamp.)

A resident thought it should be put near the old Laneco and that there should be NO 3 or 4 story buildings. Another resident, Marge Pearsall, pointed out that the EASD could not handle 4000 new students and she wondered where the new (soon to be needed) school would go. Panto replied that 120 of the units are "active adult dwellings" (over 55) and they would add no school kids. Only the 46 townhouses would have school kids.

Yet another resident asked Mr. Panto to please stop raising his voice (at the audience.) Panto explained that he had been a school teacher. He also stated that only "complainers come to meetings", that "only the negative people speak," and that the "positive people don't come to meetings." He went on to say the he has talked to many in the community who think this is a worthwhile project. The Board denied the Conditional Use for reasons set forth in the Planning Commission letter (voting 0:5.)

The COLLEGE PARK/PRELIMINARY FINAL SUBDIVISION was approved 5:0 as was the waiver from SALDO that the developer (Signature Homes) needed. It was noted that the flag lots had been eliminated as were the drives on Zucksville. Nicholas asked who will take care of the detention pond and was told that it would be the lot owner.

GREENLEAF ESTATES, PHASE 2/ACCEPTANCE OF DEED OF DEDICATION FOR STREETS was approved 5:0. Fred Hay said that this dedication was missed last summer. Solicitor Kline said this project is now known as Shawnee Ridge and that everything was in order.

PHEASANT RIDGE, PHASE 4/DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENTS was approved 5:0. Kline stated that everything is in order and that a condition is that the developer receive only 3 building permits until the issues in the other phases are resolved.

The PENN JERSEY PIPELINE CO/SALE OF PIPELINE ASSETS brought more comment from Mr. Tamborino. The pipeline crosses through a corner of HIS yard and he was concerned that it may be moved without notification. Hay said that the pipeline in question has road crossings dating from the 1950s (before permits were required). Kline noted that the Township is notified now of pipeline movement and that any new owners must continue to do so. The Board approved the signing of the letter by Ackerman.

The MET-ED/STREET LIGHT RESOLUTION/BUSHKILL RIDGE DEVELOPMENT was approved 5:0 after Kline stated that everything was in order.

The FORKS RESIDENTS AFFECTED BY PALMER TWP. PROPOSED BIKE PATH was presented by the attorney for the residents, William Coffin, Esq. Kline gave background for this issue as:

• Palmer Township acquired rights to the railroad bed of which part is in Forks Township
• Palmer is seeking grants for Rails-to-Trails
• The railroad gave them a quitclaim deed which states "We are giving (whatever) ownership rights to the property but we don't know if we have any."
• The grant agency stated that wasn't good enough
• Palmer tried to condemn land in Forks

Kichline stated that she has had no calls from Palmer Township but she has had some from citizens. Coffin explained that he is representing the residents and that a complaint has been filed against Palmer Township seeking a permanent injunction and seeking a reversionary deed. He described serious problems with the bike path and the neighbors. He said that speeding motorized vehicles (4 wheel/motorcycles/snowmobiles) are using the railbed now. A resident found a shovel in his pool. And, there can be crime in the woods. The case is now before the Northampton Court of Common Pleas. He presented the Board with color photos of some of the problems. He asked that Forks Township does not become involved. He stated that it would be more expensive and that "eminent domain costs" (money) and it would bring Forks into the lawsuit. Ackerman asked who owns the railroad bed now. Coffin said that the believes the landowners listed in the complaint do since it has been abandoned. Kline said that back in 1910 the railroad got its land 2 ways, one by outright deed and the other with "right of reverter." He did not know until now about the litigation and he said that his office has had no contact from Palmer Township.

Tom Gillen (sic) said that he teaches fishing and archery on his property and won't be able to do that anymore if the bikepath goes in. Guy Christopher (sic) stated that according to the Township Plan that land is not zoned for recreation and that people are coming through his property all the time. The owners are liable. He also said that there were rapes and vandalism on the trail in Palmer Township. Vito Tamborino said that this will stop what Palmer Township has been working on for 25 years. He said that rails-to-trails work although some trails require police presence. He said that this is "Forks land" and he would hate to see Palmer come in.

Coffin closed by mentioning that a city in Indiana approved removing rails and giving the land back. He stated that Forks will be liable for actions that occur on the bikepath (rape/kidnapping) and that "Forks can help its citizens by doing nothing." The Board complied.

The Board agreed to SET DATE & ADVERTISE MEETING/FURNITURE PRESENTATION for April 4th or 5th depending on the vendors' availability. It will take 3 hours (one hour for each vendor) and may run from 5 PM to 8 PM.

There was no CURRENT BUDGET REVIEW.

Added to the agenda (by Holmgaard at the beginning of the meeting) were:

• APPROVAL OF NEW POLICE PATCH. Dorney said that the officers designed it. It was approved 5:0.
• DISPOSAL OF OUT-OF-SERVICE POLICE CRUISERS. The Township has 2 new vehicles and therefore they can dispose of 2. One is going to the Fire Department and will be green striped. Weis said that they will retire their old car and it can go to a Township auction. The other car will be kept for Township use.

Holmgaard announced that the Township's new website will be up on Monday. The Board went into executive session to consider a personnel issue. They took no action and the meeting was adjourned.

Our objective is to relate what is experienced at Forks Township meetings for those who cannot attend. We are attempting to be as factual as we can. If we make a mistake, tell us via email or Comment here in the blog, and we will do our best to correct it. We are not perfect. We want to get it right.

Yes Virginia, The BoS CAN Change Zoning

While searching for some answers to A FORKS RESIDENT's excellent questions (see post What's It All About Alfie), I checked the Zoning Ordinance posted on the Township's website. As background, the Board has scheduled a PUBLIC HEARING on March 17, 2005 at 6:30 PM when the Strausser people will give their presentation for a zoning change to the Board of Supervisors. Before this, on March 10, 2005 at 6:30 PM, a presentation will be made to the Planning Commission (both are open to the public). The Planning Commission's recommendations will be forwarded to the Board in time for the its Public Hearing. A FORKS RESIDENT is right to be concerned about the speed of this whole thing.

.

Here it is, Article XIII (some formatting was lost) in black and white (and red from this blogger) telling us that yes, the Board of Supervisors and NOT the Zoning Hearing Board will make the decision on whether or not Strausser Enterprises can go forward with a commercial development on its 25 acres in a residential district.

.

ARTICLE XIII
AMENDMENTS

§ 1300 Power of Amendment
The Board of Supervisors may, from time to time amend, supplement, change, modify or repeal this Ordinance, including the Zoning Map. When doing so, the Board of Supervisors shall proceed in the manner prescribed in this Ordinance.

§ 1301 Initiation of Amendments
Proposals for amendment may be initiated by the Board of Supervisors on its own motion, the Planning Commission or petition by one or more owners of property to be affected by the proposed amendment, subject to the following provisions:

A. Proposals Originated by Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors shall submit to the Township Planning Commission a copy of the proposed amendment and no action shall be taken thereon by the Board of Supervisors until such time as the Planning Commission shall submit to the Supervisors its written recommendation relative thereto or until the expiration of thirty (30) days from the time of submission by the Supervisors to the Planning Commission of the said proposed action, whichever shall first occur. At least thirty (30) days prior to the hearing on any proposed amendment the Township shall submit the proposed amendment to the Lehigh Northampton Joint Planning Commission for recommendations, in accordance with Section 609.e. of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code.

B. Proposals Originated by Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may at any time transmit to the Board of Supervisors any proposal for the amendment, supplement, change, modification or repeal of this Ordinance.

C. Private Petition for Amendment. A landowner who desires to seek an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance or map shall file an application for amendment and present it to the Township with the fee as set forth by the Board of Supervisors by resolution, and shall set forth the following:

1. The applicant's name and address and his representative and the interest of every person represented in the application.
2. A plan showing the extent of the area subject to the proposed amendment, streets bounding and intersecting the area, land use and zoning classification of abutting districts, and tax parcel numbers of the areas subject to the proposed amendment.
3. A statement of the circumstances in the proposed district and the abutting districts and any other factors on which the applicant relies as reason for supporting the proposed amendment.
4. Information and analysis of traffic, water and sewer, environmental, and other impacts are required by the Township to evaluate the proposed amendment. Impact analysis requirements are in the appendix to this ordinance.

D. Proposals by Curative Amendments. A landowner who desires to challenge the validity of this Ordinance which prohibits or restricts the use or development of land in which he has an interest may submit a curative amendment to the Board of Supervisors with a written request that his challenge and proposed amendment be heard and decided as provided in Section 916.1 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (Act 247), as amended. The curative amendment shall be referred to the Planning Commission; and no action shall be taken thereon by the Board of Supervisors until such time as the Planning Commission shall submit to the Board of Supervisors its written recommendation relative thereto or until the expiration of thirty (30) days from the time of submission by the Board of Supervisors to the Planning Commission of said curative amendment, whichever shall first occur. The Board of Supervisors shall commence a hearing thereon within sixty (60) days of the request. The conduct of the hearing and the determination by the Board of Supervisors shall be in accordance with sections 609.1 (b) and (c), (1) through (5), of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, as amended.

§ 1302 Hearings

A. Upon receipt of the Planning Commission's recommendation and before voting on any proposed amendment to the Ordinance, the Board of Supervisors shall hold a public hearing thereon pursuant to public notice.

B. If the proposed amendment involves a zoning map change, notice of the proposed public hearing on said change shall be conspicuously posted by the Township at points deemed sufficient by the Township along the perimeter of the tract to notify potentially interested citizens. The affected tract or area shall be posted at least one week prior to the date of the hearing.

C. Proposed zoning ordinances and amendments shall not be enacted unless the requirements for publication, advertisement and availability of proposed ordinances as set forth by the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Act 247, as amended, Section 610, are met.

D. In the event substantial amendments are made in the proposed ordinance or amendment, before voting on enactment, the Board of Supervisors shall at least ten (10) days prior to enactment re-advertise, in one newspaper of general circulation in the Township, a brief summary setting forth all the provisions in reasonable detail together with a summary of the amendment.

§ 1303 Action upon Amendment

A. Enactment of any proposed amendment shall be by the vote of the Board of Supervisors. Any proposed amendment acted upon shall be specifically found to be in accordance with the spirit and intent of the Township Comprehensive Plan of 1997, as amended.

B. Within thirty (30) days after enactment, a copy of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance shall be forwarded to the Lehigh Northampton Joint Planning Commission.

§ 1304 Appeals

Any person desiring to challenge this Ordinance or any subsequent amendment hereto shall proceed in accordance with Article X-A of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, as amended.

§ 1305 Administration and Fees

The Board of Supervisors shall from time to time enact Rules and Regulations to facilitate the administration of this Article and shall by Resolution from time to time establish reasonable fees to be paid by applicants in order to defray expenses which may be incurred by the Township.

BoS Meeting 1/21/05

Joe Nixon's Morning Call piece and George Whacker's Express Times piece both described the regular meeting's Strausser proposal very well. Kudos. (Aside: The Express' title writer could use a map - wink wink... Mr. Santo would appreciate it.) Again, we will endeavor to fill in the blanks. The regular meeting was preceded (at 6:30 PM) by a pair of Conditional Use Hearings, one for a day care facility in a private home and one for the EASD Shawnee Middle School. The regular meeting began on schedule at 7:30 PM.

ANNOUNCEMENTS & REPORTS:

• 1/25/05 Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission & Board of Supervisors
• 2/3/05 Conditional Use Hearing for Quixote Ventures Mobile Home Park in EC1
• The check presentation by Paula Roscioli, Asst. DA - for the new K-9 program - was postponed due to a scheduling conflict.
• Supervisor Miller reported that Rick Hartranft (the new Equipment Manager at the Community Center) was working his way through the equipment.
• Supervisor Nicholas praised the new software system's more detailed reports.

CORRESPONDENCE:

Supervisor Nicholas reported receiving a letter from the Sewer Department recommending that NO new sewer lines be installed NORTH of Newlins Road.

COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR (NOT AGENDA ITEMS):

1. Resident Fritz Weide asked that the total indebtedness of the Township be printed on the Agenda for each meeting. He was told by the Township Manager that it only changed twice a year and that it could be on the Agenda then. He thought it should be on each time. He asked also what it is currently and Township Manager Kichline told him that it is "$8 million and change." He also said that he was out of town for a while and when he came back he saw an article in the Express Times that a certain builder met individually with Supervisors. He questioned whether this was permitted in the Township by-laws. He expressed his opinion that it didn't seem the proper thing to do. He asked how much it cost to perform the rezoning the last time the Township did it. No one there knew that answer as they were not on the Board (or in their current positions) when it was done. And, lastly he asked if the Board has taken a position on gambling in Palmer Township. They have not. He had more questions but alas, he was "hooked" by the new 5 minute rule.
2. Wendy Nicolosi, representing Nick Zawarski & Sons and Knollwood Estates asked about the holdup in approval. She was told by Engineer Hay that the problem is a PennDot issue re. maintenance of the stormwater system and that he was planning to meet with PennDot about it. PennDot wants the Township to manage the lines and the Township does NOT want to do that. Hay also informed Nicolosi that he does not yet have Zawarski's revised plans.
3. Dean Turner, chairman of the 250th celebration, said that the Remembrance book is now available at $20 a copy. If anyone wants one, please contact him or call the Municipal Building to order a copy.

The STATUS UPDATE BY ALEX GALE/MUNICIPAL COMPLEX included the following:

• He expects to have a report of the total cost of the Fire Department roof collapse for the next meeting.
• He expects to have the comparison (prices and pros/cons) of above ground and below ground fuel systems for the next meeting. Because of the delay, the AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FUEL TANK INSTALLATION agenda item was tabled.
• The furniture presentation will be ready soon for those on the Board who want to see it.
• There will only be one dedication plaque, not three as originally planned. He gave the Board a sample of text to use as a starting point (to compose their own.)
• Met-Ed has the new feeds switched for the Police Department. UGI has connected the new gas meter. The new phone and data wiring installation should begin next week.

Mr. Gale also discussed a CCTV system that would monitor (with cameras) the entire Municipal Complex site both inside and outside of buildings. He said that this was not in the original plan and would cost $40K to $50K. He asks that the Board consider it. Supervisor Holmgaard remarked that if they had the cameras during the 250th, the beer tent would not have been broken into. Yes, it was and a keg of beer was stolen. He said that "we need the cameras." Mr. Gale said that the 5 cameras that were in the old police building will be re-installed in the new one.

The REQUEST BY THE ELECTED TAX COLLECTOR FOR A RATE INCREASE discussion resulted in Ms. Vail being told to seek a ruling from Judge Moran if she wanted an increase in her 2005 rate. The court order establishing the rates expired 12/31/04. The order indicated that the Board could change the rate after that. Solicitor Kline said that the Board could indeed change the rate for the Elected Tax Collector... for the following term and not for the current one. He said that the deadline to do that is February 15, 2005. The Board will consider it at their next meeting on February 3, 2005.

CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST (Arlene Sauerhoefer) for an increase to 6 children in her in-home day care was granted.

CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST (EASD Shawnee Middle School), after lengthy discussion of whether to have a bike path or not have a bike path, was granted. Supervisor Holmgaard asked if the EASD (as a developer) and all the communities using the school will pay additional fees. He compared this to the fees Forks (and other communities) had to pay when the Easton sewer facility was expanded. Resident (and former Supervisor) Stan Kocher remarked that that would be just taking money from one pocket to put in the other. Vito Tamborrino, Planning Commission Chairman, discussed the possibility of overflow parking if two major events (auditorium and gymnasium) are scheduled at the same time. He requested that a paragraph be added stating that if this happens, the Township can do something.

JALAPENEAUX LAND DEVELOPMENT/INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS (Tioga Pipe service center on Kuebler Rd.) were described by Solicitor Kline as "in order." It was carried unanimously. This allows them to begin work on the infrastructure.

LEHIGH VALLEY INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LP/SUBDIVISION INDEMNIFICATION & SEWER AGREEMENTS (3 lot subdivision with Tioga Pipe on Kuebler Rd.) were described as also "in order" by Solicitor Kline. It was carried unanimously. This allows them to begin work on the infrastructure, roads etc.

RENEWAL OF LEASE FOR BRADEN AIRPARK RUNWAY TURF AREA was carried unanimously. This is a 5 year lease of land (300' x 120') at the end of the runway in case a plane has a landing problem.

STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES/REQUEST FOR ZONING CHANGE - SET PUBLIC HEARING DATES: The meeting dates were set. The Planning Commission will see the presentation at 6:30 PM on 3/10/2005 and the Board of Supervisors will see it (as well as the PC's recommendations) at 6:30 PM on 3/17/2005. Both will be held in the Municipal Building's meeting room. Sal Panto, Strausser Representative, described the project as really being two different projects. The first is on a 4-1/2 acre portion of the 25 acres and will be home to the Riverview Estates private recreation "village" (clubhouse, pool, bocce court, basketball, etc.) Panto requested a ruling at the meeting on whether this would be a USE BY RIGHT or a CONDITIONAL USE. He said that he sent two letters to the Board about this ruling last August. Neither Township Manager Kichline nor Solicitor Kline (nor any of the Supervisors) got those letters. Panto said that he would resend them. If Zoning Officer Tim Weis determines that this is a USE BY RIGHT, Strausser can begin construction of the recreation center immediately. If Weis says that it's not a USE BY RIGHT, then the rezoning for it will be included in the 25 acre parcel zoning change request. This MAJOR commercial development (in a residential area) is what the public hearing is about. Panto said that Strausser Enterprises has/is using focus groups to help them in their project design. He was asked by Township Manager Kichline to give a copy of the Strausser-prepared-zoning-ordinance to the Board for their review before the presentation. Panto said that he would but only along with a copy of the presentation on CD. He said that the (proposed) zoning ordinance couldn't be easily understood without the visual presentation. He felt that they should be able to screen it in the privacy of their own homes.

The COMMERCE BANK/LAND DEVELOPMENT proposal was rejected. There was no representative from Commerce Bank present. The initial application deadline could not be met. The bank will have to come back with a new plan and begin the process again.

RESOLUTION NO. 050120-4/STEEPLECHASE, PHASE I was tabled.

The BUDGET AMENDMENT (EMST) was passed unanimously. This will simply show the increased revenues anticipated from the new Emergency Services Tax in the 2005 budget. OPT will be changed to EMST.

Our objective is to relate what is experienced at Forks Township meetings for those who cannot attend. We are attempting to be as factual as we can. If we make a mistake, tell us via email or Comment here in the blog, and we will do our best to correct it. We are not perfect. We want to get it right.